WiFi op school

Is Wi-Fi making your child ill?

Is Wi-Fi making your child ill? - The Telegraph (9 mei 2015)

Interessant artikel in de Britse pers waarin Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe aan het woord komt, een arts die zich specialiseerde in de stralingsmaterie en die duidelijk waarschuwt voor de potentiële negatieve effecten. Ze besteedt speciale aandacht aan het gebruik van wifi en tablets op school. Meer en meer kinderen hebben klachten zoals hoofdpijn en vermoeidheid door de installatie van wifi op school. Schooldirecties en de overheid zeggen dat er geen probleem is, maar wetenschappelijke studies tonen het omgekeerde aan. Sommige ouders zien geen andere oplossing dan hun kinderen van school te halen en thuisonderwijs te geven.

Bekijk ook de heldere lezing van Dr. Mallery-Blythe op YouTube.

Six years ago, Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe moved  to the country, stopped carrying a mobile phone and sacrificed a  successful career in emergency medicine to focus on a new medical  interest – radiation emitted by Wi-Fi, mobiles and other wireless  devices.

She is now one of the  country’s few professional advisers on medical conditions related to  radiofrequency (RF) radiation and other electromagnetic fields (EMFs).

“I was using wireless devices before most people I knew – I loved it,”  says Mallery-Blythe, who was ahead of the tech trend even in 1985 when  she was handed her first mobile phone, aged 10.

“But as soon as I started digesting the literature on EMFs it was a  no-brainer,” she says of her decision to relinquish wireless gadgets.

“I wasn’t willing to take that kind of risk for something that was purely convenient.”

• Wi-Fi fears: three-year study into health risks of mobiles to children's brains


Her interest in EMFs started in 2009 after she began noticing  increasing trends in certain symptoms – headaches, insomnia, fatigue and  palpitations, but also more serious conditions including brain tumours  in young people, fertility problems and accelerating neurological  diseases such as early onset Alzheimer’s and autism. As yet there is  still no scientific proof that relates these diseases to radiation, but  Mallery-Blythe is among a not insignificant number of scientists and  practitioners concerned by those studies that do highlight cause for  more precaution.

Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe discusses the effects of Wi-Fi radiation with a class of schoolchildren [PHOTO: GEOFF PUGH]


Over the past few years, as Wi-Fi, laptops and iPads have become  increasingly prevalent in classrooms, Mallery-Blythe says “hundreds” of  families have sought her help with what they believe to be EMF-related  diseases and health issues.

One such case is that of  nine-year-old Jessica Lewis’s family. In the autumn term of 2011,  Jessica started to complain that she was getting bad headaches at  school. She was also feeling overly tired, developed rashes on her legs  and her parents said she looked “completely washed out” after school,  particularly on Mondays. A quick internet search threw up a forum where  parents had written that their children complained of similar symptoms  after installing Wi-Fi.

• Introducing the pepper grinder that will switch off your kids' phones


“I ignored it. We didn’t know anything about Wi-Fi then,” says  Jessica’s father, Paul Lewis. “We didn’t think her school had it.”

Later that term, at a parents’ evening, he noticed a Wi-Fi router near  Jessica’s desk in her new form classroom. As it turned out, Monday was  the day of the week the whole class worked on laptops.

When a  local GP backed up Lewis’s suspicions about Wi-Fi being the probable  cause of Jessica’s headaches, he went to some lengths to try to convince  Spotbrough Copley Junior School in Doncaster to use wires instead of  Wi-Fi, even offering to pay for the school building to be wired with  cables.

• Mobile phones unlikely to harm human health, scientists find


The school pointed out that a government report advised that Wi-Fi  exposures were well within internationally accepted standards.  Guidelines were reviewed in 2011 and still stand today. “We do not think  the balance of available scientific evidence on radiofrequency has  shifted and, as such, our position remains that PHE [Public Health  England] sees no reason why Wi-Fi should not continue to be used in  schools and in other places,” says Dr Simon Mann at PHE, the Department  of Health’s agency in charge of health protection.

Dr Mallery-Blythe tests radiation levels at a school internet router [PHOTO: GEOFF PUGH]


“That just didn’t add up,” says Lewis. Now Jessica is home-schooled,  much to her frustration, because symptoms resurface when she’s exposed  to Wi-Fi.

In February, insurance market Lloyd’s of London informed schools that it was excluding liability coverage for injuries “resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields,  electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise”,  which means that school officials could be personally liable for  exposing children and staff to microwave radiation.

“The  Government is expecting head teachers to decide whether risk versus  benefit is worthwhile. This seems unfair to me,” says Mallery-Blythe.  “Most teachers don’t even know that RF is currently classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a Group 2B carcinogen, which means it is a possible cause of  cancer in humans. There is a vast amount of published literature  documenting the harmful effects on every biological system. Most people  understandably don’t have time to read and digest it all.”

• Ban mobile phones and wireless networks in schools, say European leaders


As well as founding the Physicians’ Health Initiative for Radiation and  Environment (PHIRE) to inform doctors of the issues and advise on best  health practice, Mallery-Blythe gives talks to teachers around the  country, in which she presents scientific studies that reveal both short  and long-term effects of EMF exposure. One of the talks (below) has had  more than 15,000 views on YouTube since last November. It’s an engaging  summary of the issues that concerned scientists are discussing. “I try  to present the facts the authorities aren’t highlighting,” says  Mallery-Blythe.

I was surprised to find myself glued to it. Particularly eye-opening  are the number of widely held misconceptions about radiation safety that  Mallery-Blythe sets about busting. Standing a good distance away from a  Wi-Fi router may reduce radiation intensity, for example, but  low-intensity windows of radiation have been shown to be more harmful in  some studies than higher-intensity exposures.

“At the moment  people think their children are safe because the router is far away – or  we don’t have to worry about the phone because it’s not near the brain.  That’s common sense but unfortunately we now know it’s not quite true,”  she says, pointing out that the brain is better protected than some  more vulnerable parts of the body.

Are the Department of Health and PHE doing too little? “My main issue with the PHE’s stance is that it’s contradictory,” says Mallery-Blythe.

“They’ve issued a caution saying children under 16 shouldn’t be using  mobile phones except for essential calls, but they’ve been quite happy  to support the one-to-one iPad scheme, though an iPad can have an  equivalent or higher SAR (the rate at which energy is absorbed by the  human body when exposed to a radio frequency) than a phone.”

Switch your phone to flight mode or turn it off as often as you can, advises Dr Mallery-Blythe [PHOTO: GEOFF PUGH]


Associate Professor Olle Johansson,  a neuroscientist at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, compares  putting an iPhone near a baby’s head to “putting it next to several  electric train engines”, pointing out that working with train engines is  Sweden’s highest occupational exposure allowance.

Johansson has  been researching the biological effects of radiofrequency (RF) wireless  radiation for more than 30 years, but says it has become “extremely  hard to get funding” in this area. “Given the importance of the subject  I’d say that’s more than enigmatic.”

He predicts a “paradigm  shift” in attitudes towards EMF. We are currently living in an  environment estimated to contain more than 10 billion times more RF  radiation than it did in the Sixties. “If this environment is safe we’re  talking about in the order of 15,000 to 25,000 papers – in  peer-reviewed scientific journals – all being wrong. That has never  happened before.”

“We just want to see some precautionary action put in place, and we’re not seeing it.”

Wi-Fi at home: Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe’s advice

Try to keep your mobile switched off and don’t use it unless you need  to. Keep it in flight mode when it is on and never carry your mobile  close to your body, even on standby.

Don’t use Wi-Fi for  internet. Instead use an Ethernet cable and buy a router with no  wireless capacity or disable it. Disable Wi-Fi on your computer or  tablet by disabling the wireless card via the control panel or putting  it into flight mode.

Replace cordless landlines with corded ones. Most cordless telephones give off radiation whether they’re in use or not.


In February the French government banned Wi-Fi in nursery schools and  restricted use in primary schools. The German government has  recommended that the use of Wi-Fi in the workplace or home should be  avoided where possible. LA has reduced student exposure to Wi-Fi  radiation to 10,000 times below US government standard.

In 2000,  a report commissioned by the Government concluded that no school should  fall within 100 metres of a mobile phone mast; in 2007 a BBC Panorama programme found that the readings next to a classroom laptop showed radiation at  double the level only 100 metres from a mobile phone mast.

A  five-year-old absorbs up to 60 per cent more radiation than an adult due  largely to their thinner skulls and the high water content of a young  body. In Western countries brain tumours have overtaken leukaemia as the  most common cause of cancer in children.

A 2008 study found a fivefold increase in the risk of glioma (a  form of brain cancer now recognised by the World Health Organisation as  being linked to mobile phone usage) for those starting mobile phone use  under 20 years of age, indicating that the age group at first use is  highly significant.

Schools and parents can find out more through ssita.org.uk